Computer Technos

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 6 July 2012

The TPC

Posted on 08:40 by Unknown
As noted earlier, the first attempts at standardizing a systems-level benchmark took place in the second half of the 1980s, with the introduction of the debit/credit benchmark, or TP1.

To mitigate deficiencies in the definition of this benchmark and to establish a rigorous basis for systems comparison, a group of computer systems vendors and DBMS vendors formed the Transaction Processing Council (TPC). The TPC aimed to both define a benchmark for transaction-processing systems and to specify rigorous publication rules for the results. Each TPC member is committed to obeying the rules, which require results to be accompanied by publication of a detailed report. Reports are subject to audit.

TPC then published a new benchmark to characterize decision support applications, and then, later, one for Web-based transactional applications. The history of TPC benchmarks can be summarized by the following list (benchmarks shown in bold were current at the beginning of 2002):

» TPC-A (1989): a simple transaction which does one update to a bank
account
» TPC-B (1990): the “database portion” of TPC-A
» TPC-C (1992): a benchmark involving multiple, complex transactions
» TPC-D (1995): decision support
» TPC-H (1999): decision support
» TPC-R (1999): decision support
» TPC-W (2000): Web-based transaction processing (e.g., electronic commerce, B2B, etc.)

The TPC benchmarks allow systems to be compared in two ways:
» Performance (for example, number of transactions per unit of time)
» Price/performance (for example, total cost of ownership over a threeyear period per transaction per minute)

The benchmark is not specified by source code, and so it is the responsibility of each TPC member who wishes to characterize a system to implement the benchmarks for those systems.

The TPC does not measure systems itself.

As far as the benchmarks are concerned, system cost comprises the cost of acquiring the system from the vendor (hardware and software) along with the costs of maintenance for three years. The transactions called for must be implemented properly, respecting the ACID properties of atomicity, coherence, insulation and durability.

Information on the activities and the standards issued by the TPC, as well as the published results of measurements, is available on their Web site at http:// www.tpc.org.

Source of Information : Elsevier Server Architectures
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Server Architectures | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Windows 7 Shortcut Keys
    Longtime users of Windows have probably grown accustomed to navigating around the Windows user interface using the keyboard. This especially...
  • Windows on Mac: Virtualization Solutions
    If you’d prefer to join the ever-increasing ranks of Mac switchers—you traitor, you—you can still run Windows and, more important, Windows a...
  • Customizing Library Folders in Windows 7
    In your library folders, you can customize view options based on the contents. In the toolbar of the Pictures and Music library folders, Win...
  • Windows 7 BitLocker Drive Encryption
    In Windows Vista, you had the BitLocker Drive Encryption feature that allowed you to encrypt the content of entire volumes. In Windows 7, Mi...
  • Using Windows 7’s Performance Options
    While all the performance tools are available individually throughout the system, Windows 7 introduces a nice list of available tools, if yo...
  • Windows 7 - Installing and Configuring a Printer
    If your printer is already installed and operational at this point, you can skip this section and skim ahead for others that may be of inter...
  • Considering Centralized versus Group Sharing
    One of the most important preparation steps for your server is determining how to store the data you create. The two common methods are cent...
  • Berkeley Motes
    The Berkeley motes are a family of embedded sensor nodes sharing roughly the same architecture. Let us take the MICA mote as an example. The...
  • Using Windows 7 Ease of Access Tools
    If you have difficulty using a mouse or typing, have slightly impaired vision, or are deaf or hard of hearing, you can adjust the appearance...
  • Troubleshooting Boot and Startup Problems - Driver Loading in Safe Mode
    How does Windows know which device drivers and services are part of standard and networking-enabled safe mode? The answer lies in the HKLM\S...

Categories

  • Access 2010
  • BlackBerr
  • BlackBerry
  • Computer Science
  • Cyber Security
  • Exchange Server 2010
  • File Utilities
  • Foursquare
  • Google
  • Hardware
  • Internet
  • iPad
  • Linux
  • Lync Server
  • Microsoft Virtualization
  • Mobile Web
  • Networking
  • News
  • Security
  • Server Architectures
  • Smartphone
  • Ubuntu Linux
  • Windows
  • Windows 7
  • Windows Home Server
  • Windows Security
  • Windows Server 2008
  • Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V
  • Windows XP
  • Wireless

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2012 (66)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ▼  July (9)
      • REVISITING ASSUMPTIONS
      • A NEW MEDIUM
      • Dawn of the Modern Mobile Web
      • Wireless Access Protocol
      • i - mode in Japan
      • Early Mobile Web Technologies
      • THE INEVITABILITY OF A MOBILE WEB
      • The TPC
      • Numbering the Operations Master (OM) Roles
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2011 (85)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (230)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (31)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (32)
    • ►  February (28)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ►  2009 (119)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (31)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (20)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile