Computer Technos

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, 9 June 2012

Quick Migration and Live Migration

Posted on 07:25 by Unknown
There are two forms of automated migration provided by Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V: Quick Migration and Live Migration. These migration processes can be used to increase service availability for planned and unplanned downtime. Although both technologies achieve the same thing—moving virtual servers between Hyper-V hosts—they use different methods and mechanisms to achieve it. Both require at least two Hyper-V host servers in a cluster, attached to the same shared storage system. Usually, the shared storage is an iSCSI or Fibre Channel storage area network (SAN).


Quick Migration
Quick Migration provides a way to quickly move a virtual machine from one host server to another with a small amount of downtime.

In a Quick Migration, the guest virtual machine is suspended on one host and resumed on another host. This operation happens in the time it takes to transfer the active memory of the virtual machine over the network from the first host to the second host. For a host with 8GB of RAM, this might take about two minutes using a 1GB iSCSI connection.

Quick Migration was the fastest migration available for Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V. Microsoft made considerable investments in Hyper-V migration technologies, trying to reduce the time required to migrate virtual machines between Hyper-V hosts. The result was Live Migration, which has the same hardware requirements as Quick Migration, but with a near instantaneous failover time.


Live Migration
Since the release of Hyper-V V1 with Windows Server 2008, the number-one mostrequested feature by customers is the ability to migrate running virtual machines between hosts, with no downtime. VMware’s VMotion has been able to do this for some time. Finally, with Windows Server 2008 R2, it can be done natively with Hyper-V for no extra cost. This makes it a compelling reason to move to Hyper-V.

Live Migration uses failover clustering. The quorum model used for your cluster will depend on the number of Hyper-V nodes in your cluster. In this example, we will use two Hyper-V nodes in a Node and Disk Majority Cluster configuration. There will be one shared storage LUN used as the cluster quorum disk and another used as the Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) disk.


If there is only one shared storage LUN available to the nodes when the cluster is formed, Windows will allocate that LUN as the cluster quorum disk and it will not be available to be used as a CSV disk.

Source of Information : Sams - Windows Server 2008 R2 Unleashed
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Windows Server 2008 | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Using Windows 7 Ease of Access Tools
    If you have difficulty using a mouse or typing, have slightly impaired vision, or are deaf or hard of hearing, you can adjust the appearance...
  • Advanced Crash Dump Analysis - Stack Trashes
    Stack overrun or stack trashing typically results from a buffer overrun or underrun or when a driver passes a buffer address located on the ...
  • Windows 7 Data Security Enhancements
    Maintaining data integrity on the PC is a constant job for IT people. Independent businesspeople without the aid of an IT professional worry...
  • Why were parallel databases a limited success?
    As with any new technology, time is needed for development and experience in tuning for good performance and acceptable stability. Recall, a...
  • Why Does Windows Crash?
    Windows crashes (stops execution and displays the blue screen) for many possible reasons. A common source is a reference to a memory address...
  • Windows 7 Entertainment
    A few odds and ends in the entertainment department are worth noting. Though this is not the full list, these are the notables: • Media Cent...
  • Windows Malware Defense-in-Depth
    Defense-in-depth is a proven technique of layered protection that reduces the exposure of vulnerabilities. For example, you might design a n...
  • Enterprise Voice Benefits
    Perhaps some of the most tangible, new, and exciting benefits of Lync Server are those related to the Enterprise Voice set of features. With...
  • Berkeley Motes
    The Berkeley motes are a family of embedded sensor nodes sharing roughly the same architecture. Let us take the MICA mote as an example. The...
  • Windows 7 Hardware Requirements
    Let’s start with the basics. The principal (and minimal) hardware requirements for running Windows 7 are as follows: With Windows 7, Microso...

Categories

  • Access 2010
  • BlackBerr
  • BlackBerry
  • Computer Science
  • Cyber Security
  • Exchange Server 2010
  • File Utilities
  • Foursquare
  • Google
  • Hardware
  • Internet
  • iPad
  • Linux
  • Lync Server
  • Microsoft Virtualization
  • Mobile Web
  • Networking
  • News
  • Security
  • Server Architectures
  • Smartphone
  • Ubuntu Linux
  • Windows
  • Windows 7
  • Windows Home Server
  • Windows Security
  • Windows Server 2008
  • Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V
  • Windows XP
  • Wireless

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2012 (66)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ▼  June (9)
      • Defining the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol...
      • Conceptualizing the AD DS Schema
      • Outlining Functional Levels in Windows Server 2008...
      • Examining the Key Features of Active Directory Dom...
      • Examining the Evolution of Directory Services
      • Performing a Live Migration
      • Quick Migration and Live Migration
      • Various RAID Levels
      • Common Internet File System
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2011 (85)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (230)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (31)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (32)
    • ►  February (28)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ►  2009 (119)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (31)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (20)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile